When the foundations no longer fit together
Provisions added over many years, outdated references and fees that no longer cover costs make day-to-day work unnecessarily difficult. Individual rules may still function in isolation, but together they create contradictions, uncertainty and extra effort.
Ried-Brig commissioned pluma to organise key regulations and restructure its schedule of fees.
Four stages instead of isolated corrections
The review follows a clear process:
- Inventory: Which foundations apply, and when were they last revised?
- Gap analysis: Where are rules missing, and where do provisions conflict?
- Redrafting: First the regulations that define the structure, then the operational rules.
- Consultation and decision: Prepare political decisions and responsibilities transparently.

Fees are political too
A schedule of fees is not simply a technical price list. It affects cost recovery, social fairness, incentives and comparisons with other municipalities. pluma therefore separates the technical basis from the political decision: costs and options are first made transparent, after which the municipality consciously chooses the level it wants.
Legally sound and practical in everyday work
A good legal text alone is not enough. Administration and elected officials need to know who decides, how a process works and how fees are communicated. That is why legal, financial, procedural and plain-language considerations are addressed together.
What municipalities can learn
- Do not wait for a specific dispute before reviewing regulations.
- Understand the full body of regulations before amending individual texts.
- Calculate fees professionally and set them through conscious political decisions.
- Provide a simple maintenance process for future amendments.
A similar project?
Tell us about your situation. In a 30-minute, no-obligation conversation, we will clarify which next steps make sense.

